‘Philippines would be better off shunning Chinese investment altogether’


    MANILA, Philippines — Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte risks repeating the mistakes made by other countries in the region that suffered from rising debt by accepting Chinese investments, a London-based think tank warned.

    Duterte plans to spend trillions of peso to bridge the Philippines’ infrastructure gap, and to do so courted Beijing for funding to reduce strain on his government’s budget.

    Manila and Beijing on Tuesday signed 29 bilateral deals, including new plans for increased infrastructure investments and a preliminary agreement to cooperate on oil and gas exploration in the disputed South China Sea.

    However, some analysts believe the Chinese leader’s visit did not yield material gains, saying the deals signed in the presence of Duterte and visiting Chinese President Xi Jinping were in broad strokes and vague.

    In a commentary on Thursday, Capital Economics said given the corruption problems associated with Chinese projects and the Philippines’s current account gap already “approaching unsustainable levels,” Chinese investment “could make problems worse.”

    The think tank cited Sri Lanka and Pakistan’s recent dealings with Chinese loans as a cautionary tale for the Philippines.

    “The upshot is that while improvements to the country’s infrastructure are desperately needed, the pace of increase needs to be managed properly in order to avoid further balance of payments strains,” Capital Economics said.

    “If Chinese plans do eventually go ahead, the Philippines would need to row back on its own spending plans,” it added.

    Critics have warned that the Philippines could be the next victim of what they say is China’s “debt trap diplomacy,” where Beijing gives “friendly” loans to bankroll infrastructure projects in financially weak states in exchange for control over strategic assets.

    Debt trap?

    The Philippines has been incurring wide trade gaps since last year, as Duterte pursues an ambitious infrastructure program that has been fuelling demand for imports of construction-related goods.

    The increasing capital goods imports due to the infrastructure boom have reversed the country’s current account surplus to a deficit, pressuring the Philippine peso.

    A surge in Chinese infrastructure investment in Pakistan has led to a wider current account deficit, prompting Pakistani officials to seek a bailout from the International Monetary Fund amid a crashing currency.

    Struggling to pay its obligation, Sri Lanka in December last year gave the strategic port of Hambantota to Beijing on a 99-year lease as a way of repaying Chinese loans. Meanwhile, Malaysia has recently canceled a number of Chinese-backed projects due to worries about corruption.

    Of the 10 big-ticket projects in the pipeline that China promised to finance, the Philippines has so far completed only two loan agreements — the $62.09 million Chico River Pump Irrigation Project and $232.5 million New Centennial Water Source Kaliwa Dam Project in Rizal.

    Philippine policymakers have repeatedly said the country won’t fall into an alleged “debt trap” with China.

    “Given the experience of other countries in the region which have suffered from rising debt and increased corruption, the Philippines would be better off shunning Chinese investment altogether,” Capital Economics said.